<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberty Bill: Put The Constitution on the Dollar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artlung.com/blog/2005/06/18/constitution-on-the-dollar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artlung.com/blog/2005/06/18/constitution-on-the-dollar/</link>
	<description>Blogging sporadically since February 2001.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Crawford</title>
		<link>http://artlung.com/blog/2005/06/18/constitution-on-the-dollar/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artlung.com/blog/2005/06/18/liberty-bill-put-the-constitution-on-the-dollar/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Yeah, there's a whole pile of good reasons to do this.

I really like it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there&#8217;s a whole pile of good reasons to do this.</p>
<p>I really like it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thogek</title>
		<link>http://artlung.com/blog/2005/06/18/constitution-on-the-dollar/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Thogek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artlung.com/blog/2005/06/18/liberty-bill-put-the-constitution-on-the-dollar/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>A very interesting idea.

Of course, it'll also raise the side-question that the traditional "In God We Trust" line technically violates the 1st Amendment (which becomes a bit more obvious when we start listing the Amendments right there on the bill under that very line).  Can't wait to see the interesting arguments that arise.  :-O

And, if course, if we ever pass another Amendment, we'll have to update the bill again... not that that happens often... hmm... sort of a history embedded in the currency...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting idea.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;ll also raise the side-question that the traditional &#8220;In God We Trust&#8221; line technically violates the 1st Amendment (which becomes a bit more obvious when we start listing the Amendments right there on the bill under that very line).  Can&#8217;t wait to see the interesting arguments that arise.  :-O</p>
<p>And, if course, if we ever pass another Amendment, we&#8217;ll have to update the bill again&#8230; not that that happens often&#8230; hmm&#8230; sort of a history embedded in the currency&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
