<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if you have to un-override a native VBScript Function?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/</link>
	<description>Blogging sporadically since February 2001.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sassy</title>
		<link>http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/#comment-57130</link>
		<dc:creator>Sassy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/#comment-57130</guid>
		<description>wow that is insanity!  I am always amazed at the stuff people do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow that is insanity!  I am always amazed at the stuff people do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Crawford</title>
		<link>http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/#comment-57104</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/#comment-57104</guid>
		<description>Because the codebase has 8 year old nuggets where mofos do stuff like rewrite the NumberFormat function, and if you want to get to the *actual* functionality of the NumberFormat function, you have to do this silly thing.

I like to think of it like function or operator overloading, but much, much stupider, because you lose the original functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the codebase has 8 year old nuggets where mofos do stuff like rewrite the NumberFormat function, and if you want to get to the <strong>actual</strong> functionality of the NumberFormat function, you have to do this silly thing.</p>
<p>I like to think of it like function or operator overloading, but much, much stupider, because you lose the original functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sassy</title>
		<link>http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/#comment-57101</link>
		<dc:creator>Sassy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artlung.com/blog/2006/11/01/what-if-you-have-to-un-override-a-native-vbscript-function/#comment-57101</guid>
		<description>you never answered the question... why would you want to do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you never answered the question&#8230; why would you want to do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
