Smorgasborg - Random Objects

Measuring weight loss with a belt 2010 Feb 27

I don’t have a scale handy that is capable of giving my weight, but I’m skeptical about whether that number is meaningful anyway.

What is meaningful is the amount of belt I could be using. It looks like about 6 inches (a little more than 15 cm) of loss on my waist in the past year or so.

Belt positions, Feb 27, 2010

MAS, has a post about his skepticism of Body Mass Index. Hugh Jackman and Mike Tyson at his peak would measure as “Obese” according to the BMI, basically. In that post he cites The Frankie Method for measuring leanness. Frankie was a trainer at a former gym of MAS, and his measure was: “Can you see your abs? If no, then you are too fat.” My answer to that is still no, but I can see the outlines of where they will be.

I made a diagram:

The Frankie Method for measuring leanness
Joe Crawford blogged this at 12:05pm in 2010 in February. The 27th was a Saturday. You are reading this 9 years later. Make a public comment. There are 4 comments Tweet. Direct message. Send email. It has hashtags→ .

Comments: 4

Love the flowchart. I am working on a post that describes a metric that provides more guidance than the Frankie method and gets around the problems of using BMI.

I updated the flowchart, since leanness does not automatically imply “healthy” – people in a famine, anorexics, and the sick may have abs to show, but health is not the thing, it’s simply, “not fat.”

I’ll be looking forward to your post MAS!

Emerita Lovato Preciado

November 17, 2014 2:42am

The Frankie method is ridiculous, but true.

Joe I agree totally, you can’t be healthy when you are obese, but if you are lean, that does not mean you are healthy.

Leave a Reply

Comments Open; Trackbacks Open.